14 South Carolina citizens, who worked tirelessly to gather evidence and learn constitutional law, filed a “Pro se” lawsuit against previous and current members of the South Carolina Elections Commission in the United States District Court of South Carolina in August 2022. The suit provided extensive evidence towards compromised elections in the state of South Carolina via federal involvement in state elections, improperly certified voting machines, foreign involvement in state elections, internet connectivity of voting machines resulting in illegal transfer of citizens’ personal data and violating the South Carolina state Constitution Article 11 Section 1 by counting our votes in secret.
The laws cited in the case are available here.
Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants unconstitutionally aligned with federal agencies CIS, DHS, CISA, and EIS-GCC. These memberships violated laws preventing South Carolina from combining election security, planning, implementing, and executing SC state elections with other states, as well as the United States Constitution.
The lawsuit provided extensive research regarding the improper certification and accreditation of all voting machines used in the state of South Carolina. Signatures required on voting machine Certificates of Accreditation are allegedly not in compliance with laws and guidelines as set forth by the State of South Carolina and HAVA. As well, Plaintiffs provided evidence that VSTLs were not properly accredited for use in the 2020 General Election due to the EAC not meeting quorum in 2020 or in any year since 2020.
Plaintiffs claimed foreign interference in the South Carolina elections. DNI John Ratcliffe has expressly stated that foreign countries were, in fact, involved in the U.S. 2020 General Election, and the Defendants to this lawsuit have refused to investigate potential fraud or even problems with the S.C. General Election or the 2022 S.C. Primary Election, despite Plaintiffs’ repeated pleas and requests. Additionally, election night reporting in South Carolina is conducted by SCYTL, a Spain-based corporation with servers in Germany, which plaintiffs allege violates EO 13848, prohibiting the counting of Unites States votes offshore.
The suit provided exhibits to validate the claim that South Carolina voting machines are connected via the internet, thus compromising the personal data of voters. Albert, a federally-funded initiative deployed on state election networks, is used by Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC) to mentor voter registration databases. Plaintiffs alleged that all public-facing IP addresses, ranges, and domains in the State of South Carolina were shared by Defendants with EI-ISAC, thereby violating voters’ Constitutional right to privacy.
Plaintiffs asked that voter freedom and adherence to the Constitution be restored in the State of South Carolina and that Defendants honor the oath they took upon accepting their position to uphold both the U.S. and S.C. Constitutions by banning voting machines and returning to the use of paper ballots, by allowing only same-day voting, and by terminating partnerships with federal organizations. Plaintiffs also demanded that the State Election Commission be disbanded to allow the Secretary of State to resume the responsibility of certifying elections. Finally, the Plaintiffs asked the court to decertify the General Election of 2020.
UPDATE:
The Plaintiffs persevered for a year and a half and went through the Discovery process, but unfortunately the case was dismissed for “Lack of Standing.” However, we will continue to help educate the public regarding the corruption and demand that our voter laws be revised.
Listen to an audio reading of the affidavit cited in the lawsuit.